If you read my last blog, you’ll know I’ve been getting hot under the collar about evidence gaps and I’m not about to quieten down about those any time soon, as you’ll see if you read to the end of the blog. There are not just gaps but some enormous black holes, this time not because no evidence was found but because so much of it was unusable. But at least there’s good news too; some reviewers find what they’re looking for and can give us evidence which shows benefits from particular interventions. So, if you logged on thinking you’d like to read about teeth, pain (from several causes), schizophrenia treatments, gut bacteria and jellyfish (really!), you’ve come to the right place.
What’s in your toothpaste? A new Cochrane review sent me scurrying to the bathroom to check the ingredients list on mine. ‘What’s your toothpaste in?’ is an altogether different question and I admit to having got thoroughly diverted by taking a peep at the world of marketing this unsexy product, still dominated by the tube packaging which was introduced in 1892. Who knew that we needed our toothpaste sold to us in shiny cartons to make us feel it’s worth the price? Anyway, you can forget all that and cut to the ingredients list. The review compared fluoride toothpastes containing triclosan, an antibacterial ingredient, and copolymer, which cuts down the amount of triclosan that’s washed away, with fluoride toothpastes without those ingredients and looked at aspects of oral health. There was moderate quality evidence that the triclosan/copolymer-containing toothpastes reduced plaque and inflamed or bleeding gums, though it’s not clear whether these reductions were enough to be Clinical significance is the practical importance of an effect (e.g. a reduction in symptoms); whether it has a real genuine, palpable, noticeable effect on daily life. It is not the same as statistical significance. For instance, showing that a drug lowered the heart rate by an average of 1 beat per minute would not be clinically significant, as it is unlikely to be a big enough effect to be important to patients and healthcare providers. More. High quality evidence showed a 5% reduction in tooth decay associated with the triclosan/copolymer toothpaste and no ill effects in studies lasting up to three years.*
Anyone who’s had wisdom teeth removed will know that this can be a very painful business so it’s good news that we have high quality evidence from a Cochrane review on ibuprofen and/or paracetamol (acetaminophen) for pain relief after surgical removal of lower wisdom teeth that ibuprofen offers better pain relief than paracetamol at all the doses compared, with ibuprofen 400 mg and paracetamol 1000 mg the most commonly compared, based on Data is the information collected through research. More collected six hours after surgery. New drugs which combine the two are showing promising results and more research is needed to establish the The ability of an intervention (for example a drug, surgery, or exercise) to produce a desired effect, such as reduce symptoms. More and Refers to serious adverse effects, such as those that threaten life, require or prolong hospitalization, result in permanent disability, or cause birth defects. More of these. The limited available evidence on side effects suggests these were mild and were comparable between Something done with the aim of improving health or relieving suffering. For example, medicines, surgery, psychological and physical therapies, diet and exercise changes. More groups.
Would you know what to do if you got stung by a jellyfish? I wouldn’t, so I looked this up and the first advice I came across started with ‘panicking would be unhelpful’. Oh, ok. Then you have to get out of the water as it might affect your ability to swim. Duh! If, after exiting the water, possibly with a bit of screaming if you failed at the ‘don’t panic’ bit, you then find yourself calmly logging on to The Cochrane Library, you’ll find a new review on treatments for jellyfish stings. Sorry to say, the evidence is pretty poor and whilst there’s a teensy suggestion (low quality evidence from one trial) that hot water immersion may be effective for Physalia (Bluebottle) stings, we’re really still in the dark (or, should I say, hot water).
New evidence has been added to a review on the drug duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy and different types of chronic pain which shows that duloxetine, at doses of 60mg and 120mg daily, is effective for treating pain in diabetic peripheral neuropathy, but lower doses are not, and the reviewers say there is no need for further Clinical trials are research studies involving people who use healthcare services. They often compare a new or different treatment with the best treatment currently available. This is to test whether the new or different treatment is safe, effective and any better than what is currently used. No matter how promising a new treatment may appear during tests in a laboratory, it must go through clinical trials before its benefits and risks can really be known. More. There is lower quality evidence that duloxetine is effective in fibromyalgia at similar doses and with a similar magnitude of effect. Minor side effects are common, especially with 120mg doses, but serious side effects are rare.
Some light has been shed too on the question of what’s the ideal length of treatment for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), a bacterium commonly found in the stomach, which may never cause symptoms but is also associated with stomach ulcers and cancers. Triple therapy treatment with a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and two antibiotics is the most common approach to getting rid of it, but for how long should treatment last? A week? Ten days? Fourteen? There’s no agreement. Now, a Cochrane Reviews are systematic reviews. In systematic reviews we search for and summarize studies that answer a specific research question (e.g. is paracetamol effective and safe for treating back pain?). The studies are identified, assessed, and summarized by using a systematic and predefined approach. They inform recommendations for healthcare and research. More has been published which compared treatments to get rid of H. pylori lasting 7, 10 or 14 days. The review includes moderate quality evidence from 75 studies and shows that the ideal length of treatment with a PPI plus amoxicillin and clarithromycin is at least 14 days. Eleven people need to be treated in this way for one to benefit. There was no difference between treatment regimes in the number of people stopping treatment because of side effects.
As my grandmother was fond of saying, “after the Lord Mayor’s Show comes the dustcart”, and here comes some seriously disappointing stuff. Don’t get me wrong, these are very good reviews asking really important questions, so we should be more than disappointed that we are still left with major uncertainties. They both concern treatments for schizophrenia. The review on chlorpromazine for schizophrenia, a ‘benchmark’ treament in common use worldwide, has been updated with the addition of five studies, bringing the total to 55. The reviewers note that these provide only low quality evidence and that 315 studies were excluded because of flaws in reporting and in research design and methods. What a waste.
The same can be said for much of the the evidence on aripiprazole, which is compared with other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia in a review which has also just been updated. 162 trials (most of them from China) have been added to the review’s original 12, involving over 17,000 participants. Hooray! Surely we’ll now have some answers to guide practice. Unfortunately, and incredibly, not.The number of people dropping out of studies, around 30% to 40%, was a problem, but not the only one. The reviewers conclude that the information on all comparisons is of limited quality, incomplete, problematic to apply clinically, and overall the The certainty (or quality) of evidence is the extent to which we can be confident that what the research tells us about a particular treatment effect is likely to be accurate. Concerns about factors such as bias can reduce the certainty of the evidence. Evidence may be of high certainty; moderate certainty; low certainty or very-low certainty. Cochrane has adopted the GRADE approach (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) for assessing certainty (or quality) of evidence. Find out more here: https://training.cochrane.org/grade-approach More is low or very low.
The problems with this review are illustrative of some of the issues I raised in my last blog. Outcome reporting is seriously flawed in many antipsychotic drug trials; sticking to the CONSORT statement (Moher 2001) would make such studies much more informative and useful. Then we need all trial data to be made available, the objective at the heart of the All Trials campaign. Also, the agreement of core Outcomes are measures of health (for example quality of life, pain, blood sugar levels) that can be used to assess the effectiveness and safety of a treatment or other intervention (for example a drug, surgery, or exercise). In research, the outcomes considered most important are ‘primary outcomes’ and those considered less important are ‘secondary outcomes’. More to be reported in trials in this, as other, sub-specialities would greatly increase the usefulness of the data and enhance In systematic reviews we search for and summarize studies that answer a specific research question (e.g. is paracetamol effective and safe for treating back pain?). The studies are identified, assessed, and summarized by using a systematic and predefined approach. They inform recommendations for healthcare and research. More (see COMET). So much waste and missed opportunity when these things aren’t addressed. On that note, for an excellent series of papers on increasing value and reducing waste in research, do hurry over to The Lancet here.
*Editor’s note: This Cochrane Review will not be updated given that as far as we are aware toothpaste containing triclosan is no longer commercially available as of early 2019
Riley P, Lamont T. Triclosan/copolymer containing toothpastes for oral health. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 12. Art. No.: CD010514. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010514.pub2.
Bailey E, Worthington HV, van Wijk A, Yates JM, Coulthard P, Afzal Z. Ibuprofen and/or paracetamol (acetaminophen) for pain relief after surgical removal of lower wisdom teeth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 12. Art. No.: CD004624. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004624.pub2
Li L, McGee RG, Isbister G, Webster AC. Interventions for the symptoms and signs resulting from jellyfish stings. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 12. Art. No.: CD009688. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009688.pub2.
Lunn MPT, Hughes RAC, Wiffen PJ. Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD007115. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007115.pub3.
Yuan Y, Ford AC, Khan KJ, Gisbert JP, Forman D, Leontiadis GI, Tse F, Calvet X, Fallone C, Fischbach L, Oderda G, Bazzoli F, Moayyedi P. Optimum duration of regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue 12. Art. No.: CD008337. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008337.pub2.
Adams CE, Awad GA, Rathbone J, Thornley B, Soares-Weiser K. Chlorpromazine versus placebo for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD000284. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000284.pub3.
Khanna P, Suo T, Komossa K, Ma H, Rummel-Kluge C, El-Sayeh HG, Leucht S, Xia J. Aripiprazole versus other atypical antipsychotics for schizophrenia. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD006569. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006569.pub5.
Page last updated 07 October 2019.