Breast cancer: your treatment, your choice

October is Breast Cancer Awareness Month so we’re putting the spotlight on some of the best recent research on breast cancer treatments. If you’re making a decision about treatment, it’s really important that you and your doctor have up-to-date, reliable information to help you. This is what Cochrane reviews are for. They are independent, systematic reviews, pulling together health research on prevention, treatments and diagnostic tests, for particular patient groups and settings, establishing whether there is conclusive evidence and what it tells us. Sometimes the evidence isn’t very good, or missing altogether; it’s important to know when there are uncertainties about treatment. They are updated regularly, ensuring that treatment decisions can be based on the most up-to-date and reliable evidence.

Trastuzumab – balancing benefits and risks

Diary Drawings: Day 707

“Slowly recovering from my treatment for breast cancer, feeling a great sense of relief and hope.”
Diary Drawings: Day 707
Credit: Bobby Baker. Wellcome Images

First, good news about trastuzumab (Herceptin®), a drug that blocks the activity of HER2, a protein that makes cancer cells divide and spread much more quickly than other cancer cells or normal cells. About 15% to 20% of breast cancers are HER2-positive and the outlook for these women has been poorer than those with HER2-negative disease.

A new Cochrane review has pooled evidence from clinical trials on women with advanced breast cancer and found that trastuzumab reduces cancer progression by more than a third. This benefit must be considered alongside the small but increased risk of developing heart problems, though most of these are reversible. Women taking trastuzumab survived for longer overall too and this effect was probably even better than the results suggest, as the authors of this editorial explain:

“when an effective treatment is being tested, patients who start to develop resistance to that treatment are usually (and completely appropriately) then given further treatment. This is good for the patient (she lives longer) but bad for science (the true effect of the tested treatment is diluted). So we welcome the apparent beneficial effect of trastuzumab on survival, but we suspect that it is better than quoted.”

The women in these trials were given trastuzumab for the first time. We don’t know how effective it is for women who relapse after being treated with it.

The same team also did a review of trial evidence for trastuzumab used to treat early breast cancer and found that for these women too, trastuzumab improves both overall survival and disease-free survival. As for women with advanced breast cancer, the risk of death is reduced but the risk of heart toxicity increased. They conclude that “in women at higher risk of recurrence and with no signs of a weak heart, trastuzumab offers far more benefits than risks. The balance of risks to benefits in patients at lower risk of recurrence (e.g. a small rather than a large tumour) must be carefully evaluated.”

Choices for older women

Women under 70 with early-stage, oestrogen-sensitive breast cancer, are almost always offered surgery plus endocrine therapy, drugs that stop cancer cell growth by blocking their oestrogen receptors. Older women are often treated just with these drugs and this is known as primary endocrine therapy. Tamoxifen has been used in this way since the 1980s, on the basis that older women are more likely to have oestrogen-sensitive breast cancer and may also be less fit for surgery.

Stick_figure_-_choice

Credit: Obsidian Soul

A Cochrane review has pulled together evidence on how surgery, with or without endocrine therapy, compares to primary endocrine therapy for these women. They found that the choice of treatment made no difference to survival but women who had surgery were less likely to relapse. Both treatments had side effects. Problems after surgery included  tingling or numbness on the arm on the side of the surgery, and psychosocial problems, while side effects of tamoxifen were hot flushes, skin rash, vaginal discharge, indigestion, breast pain, sleepiness, headache, vertigo, itching, hair loss, cystitis, acute thrombophlebitis, nausea, and indigestion.

This evidence puts surgery ahead of primary endocrine therapy in terms of local disease control and fewer ill effects but primary endocrine therapy is an option for women who don’t want surgery or are not fit enough for it.

Surgery for advanced breast cancer?

In the past women with advanced breast cancer were not offered surgery, but now it’s thought that it could improve survival. A Cochrane review looking at whether surgery is a useful treatment for women with metastatic breast cancer is under way. The review team is aware of several current trials comparing surgery plus chemotherapy with chemotherapy only for women who had metastatic breast cancer when first diagnosed, which should be publishing their first results soon.

Considering your options

Knowing what the evidence says is important for decisions about treatment and your health practitioner will bring to this their professional expertise too. As well as these, your values and preferences are vitally important. The reviews we’ve looked at here show that, like many treatments, there are things to weigh up and you will need to decide what’s most important to you.

Decision aids can help

There are resources that are specially designed to help people make decisions about difficult healthcare options. They are based on reliable evidence and they can help you think through what might be best for you. You can find patient decision aids for a number of health conditions (though not breast cancer) on this NHS Shared Decision Making website. One type of decision aid is an options grid and you can see one for breast cancer surgery here on the patient.co.uk website We also have evidence from a Cochrane review showing how decision aids can be helpful to people making treatment choices and you can read my blog about that here.

See what your doctor sees

NHS doctors use an internet resource called the Map of Medicine to help them work out the best treatment options and you can access this free resource too, so you see what your doctor sees. It’s available from NHS Choices here. The NHS Choices website has lots of other useful information about breast cancer too.

Hearing from other patients can help too

You might also like to visit healthtalk.org  Dr Anne McPherson set it up, with another doctor-patient Andrew Herxheimer, when she was diagnosed with breast cancer and couldn’t find anyone to talk to about what it was really like to have the disease. It’s a fantastic resource from patients, for patients, offering a wealth of reliable health (and other) information, shared experiences and support. You can also hear from women about the realities of living with breast cancer on Breast Cancer Care’s #hiddeneffects campaign page here, as well as reading their blog and following them on twitter @BCCare #hiddeneffects

 You can follow us on Twitter @ukcochranecentr and I also tweet as @SarahChapman30. You might also like to check out the many Cochrane summaries on breast cancer topics – these are summaries of Cochrane reviews written in plain English, with links to the full reviews and sometimes to other resources. Just go to the Cochrane Summaries site and type breast cancer into the search box. 

Links:

Balduzzi S, Mantarro S, Guarneri V, Tagliabue L, Pistotti V, Moja L, D’Amico R. Trastuzumab-containing regimens for metastatic breast cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 6. Art. No.: CD006242. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006242.pub2.

Cochrane summary and podcast http://summaries.cochrane.org/CD006242/BREASTCA_efficacy-and-safety-of-trastuzumab-in-metastatic-breast-cancer

Wilcken N. Treating metastatic breast cancer: the evidence for targeted therapy [editorial]. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014;(6):ED000083.

Moja L, Tagliabue L, Balduzzi S, Parmelli E, Pistotti V, Guarneri V, D’Amico R. Trastuzumab containing regimens for early breast cancer. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD006243. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006243.pub2.

Cochrane summary and podcast http://summaries.cochrane.org/CD006243/BREASTCA_efficacy-and-safety-of-trastuzumab-in-early-breast-cancer

Morgan J, Wyld L, Collins KA, Reed MW. Surgery versus primary endocrine therapy for operable primary breast cancer in elderly women (70 years plus). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 5. Art. No.: CD004272. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD004272.pub3.

Cochrane summary http://summaries.cochrane.org/CD004272/BREASTCA_surgery-versus-primary-endocrine-therapy-for-elderly-women-with-operable-primary-breast-cancer

Tosello G, Torloni MR, Salani B, Neeman T, Riera R. Breast surgery for metastatic breast cancer (Protocol). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 9. Art. No.: CD011276. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011276.

Stacey D, Légaré F, Col NF, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, Eden KB, Holmes-Rovner M, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Lyddiatt A, Thomson R, Trevena L, Wu JHC. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 1. Art. No.: CD001431. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001431.pub4.

Cochrane summary http://summaries.cochrane.org/CD001431/decision-aids-to-help-people-who-are-facing-health-treatment-or-screening-decisions


Sarah Chapman

About Sarah Chapman

view all posts

Sarah's work as a Knowledge Broker at Cochrane UK focuses on disseminating Cochrane evidence through social media, including Evidently Cochrane blogs, blogshots and the ‘Evidence for Everyday’ series for nurses, midwives, allied health professionals and patients. A former registered general nurse, Sarah has a particular interest making evidence accessible and useful to practitioners and to others making decisions about health. Before joining Cochrane, Sarah also worked on systematic reviews for the University of Oxford and the Royal College of Nursing Institute, and obtained degrees in History from the University of Oxford and in the history of women’s health and illness in early modern England (MPhil., University of Reading).

1 Comments on this post

  1. […] → Evidently Cochrane – Cancer du sein : votre traitement, votre choix […]

    Revue de presse – Jeudi 16 Octobre 2014 | Cancer Contribution : construire ensemble les pratiques de demain – Cancer Contribution : construire ensemble les pratiques de demain / Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

UA-49496932-1