Sarah Chapman blogs new Cochrane Reviews are systematic reviews. In systematic reviews we search for and summarize studies that answer a specific research question (e.g. is paracetamol effective and safe for treating back pain?). The studies are identified, assessed, and summarized by using a systematic and predefined approach. They inform recommendations for healthcare and research. More, published today, on vaccination reminders to increase uptake of routine vaccinations.
Postcards – they’ve been with us since the 1840s and, particularly when postal deliveries took place several times a day, they were often used for urgent communication, a bit like we might text. Unlike texts, we can still read these messages sent decades ago, and I love the hints these can give us of a story. I have one from my mum to her parents, sent from a school trip in 1950 with a request: “S.O.S – please send string. Not much.” But does the humble postcard have any place in our communications in this digital age, where there are so many ways we can communicate, and much faster than by sending a piece of cardboard to someone’s house? It seems that it does!
An updated Cochrane Review, published today, has found high quality evidence that three methods of reminding people that they are due for a vaccination, postcards, texts and computerized phone calls, increase the number of people receiving vaccinations. Simple, cheap and effective – good news!
Why is this important?
People not having routine vaccinations is a problem that results in vaccine-preventable illnesses (such as measles) and deaths. Sending reminders, either to individuals or whole populations, to let them know their vaccinations are due, or sending recalls when they are overdue, is a way of tackling the problem; but it’s important to know whether this works, and whether some methods work better than others.
What’s the evidence on vaccination reminders?
The Cochrane Reviews are systematic reviews. In systematic reviews we search for and summarize studies that answer a specific research question (e.g. is paracetamol effective and safe for treating back pain?). The studies are identified, assessed, and summarized by using a systematic and predefined approach. They inform recommendations for healthcare and research. More summarizes the results of 75 studies from 10 countries, including 55 studies involving 138,625 children, teens and adults. The studies looked at different types of reminders and recalls (including letters, postcards, texts and phone calls), sometimes in combination, and compared them with no reminders or with other ways of encouraging vaccination, such as through campaigns.
Lead Somebody responsible for preparing and, in the case of Cochrane Reviews, keeping up-to-date a systematic review. The term ‘reviewer’ is also sometimes used to refer to an external peer reviewer, or referee. More, Julie Jacobson Vann from The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Nursing explains:
“The evidence shows that reminding people to have vaccinations increases the number of people who receive vaccinations. All types of patient reminder and recall are likely to be effective, and reminding people over the telephone was most effective. Even a small effect of patient reminders and recalls, when scaled to a whole The group of people being studied. Populations may be defined by any characteristics e.g. where they live, age group, certain diseases. More, could have a large beneficial effect on public health.”
The authors acknowledge that the effects of reminders could vary when used in different settings, and that there is a need to tailor them for particular health service settings if they are to be as effective as possible, working within the available resources. The The ability of an intervention (for example a drug, surgery, or exercise) to produce a desired effect, such as reduce symptoms. More of telephone reminders may need to be balanced against the cost, for example, while health services with computerized immunization registries could adopt a system of postcard reminders sent by the registries.
This is all good news, but uptake of vaccination depends on other things too, of course, and one of those things is successfully addressing the concerns and questions that people may have about vaccinations. We’ll be looking at what the authors of another Cochrane Review discovered about parents’ views and experiences of communication about routine early childhood vaccinations in a future blog.
Join in the conversation on Twitter with @CochraneUK @SarahChapman30 @CochraneEPOC
Sarah Chapman has nothing to disclose.
References may be found here.
Watch a summary of the review below: